Columnists
- Street Youth - Joaquín Marco
Typically the media was showing frivolous youth in concentrations of the bottle, even overwhelming unemployment statistics when needed shook us that nearly half of our youth is mired in it, with no prospect of improvement in the short term. Even more serious, better training, more unemployment. He has missed just the spark the French title of a booklet for young people, thanks to new media communication, believing that what he was expressing his "indignation", which also could be called frustration, in the streets of our cities, "Real Democracy, Ya." Neither the parties or election campaigns to date, they had paid much attention. Vague promises of a mediocre season, full of topics, little attentive to everyday life, without clear solutions in sight, has fueled a virtual movement goal, but that has filled "tweeds" and "hashtags". Young people and people of different ages, wanted to show. The least is that they ban it at election time. The streets are and will also theirs. Nobody is a prophet and therefore we can not infer how much travel will this particular movement, fed into the network, hovering just part of an ear. It may not be a problem for traditional political parties. However, it would be quite unaware that they, whoever wins the local and regional elections on Sunday (in which all winners will), do not try to attract the youth, not only disappointed the party system, but a few springs believed achieved with democracy and that was reflected in the Constitution now in force and always revisable.
The requests of these young people reflect a general unease and tension in the background. And who can hit the streets but they who decide not to join political parties or unions to which they considered responsible for their situation? It would be desirable that the study centers of different parties, devote attention not only to the electoral phenomenon that is about to arrive, or the next that it threatens us, but to prepare the ground for some changes, right and left, which should be included in a constitution more responsive to certain claims that are proposed and which are not even new. It is clear that the major political or trade union are moving elephants slowly. Immobility, in many cases, it means endurance. But if they do not act in time, the crisis can shatter those who feel unable to cope. Perhaps this ghost returns to his grave in a short time, but no doubt he will return and larger. The models put forward (Egypt and Tunisia) are not valid, but are observed. This country already has an imperfect democracy, but democracy. But the economy can not violate social rights. It is possible that the gap between rich and poor is growing, nor parked let a generation, young people on forever in the parental home, which means the spread of public corruption scandals and private, that justice act more diligently. What the "neither nor" was not to laugh, but banks are to yours. The fragility of democracies lies in its very nature. Also his greatness, when used. And lies not only in voting when they call out to vote. Our youth are facing the road because he knows that within the political parties will be badly received, because what is calls its programs, it is estimated that the economic world and not the politician who holds the reins of government. And these economic forces there at the moment, who will tie short. If the system-not just the English you need so many patches, unfair means, not self-reform, it reharán other medium to long term. When the crisis began, and it seemed years ago that some leaders were willing to design controls that would deter blunders that led us where we are today. Nothing has been done in this connection except the weak patch and threatening to exceptional measures how many are on the brink of the abyss. These young people on the street do not respond to the French model of May 68. They say peaceful, appear contrary to bipartisanship, chanting slogans against banks. They know because the disease is not proper. They live and manifest in the totality of new forms of communication. You have to draw them into a policy whose boundaries they are comfortable, enabling them to participate. But until we discover how to modify political relations with economic forces-the heart of the matter, and they understand that suits them, even moderate gains, little progress will be made. The dialogue may be deaf. The danger is that if politicians do not give results falling by the wayside, replaced by a multitude of other new parties or groups that will hinder the government. The twenty-first century does not appear, fortunately, inclined to speed or strength solutions, as above. But a society stuck and immobile, like a ship in the ice, just sinking. Renew or die.
0 comments:
Post a Comment